ATTRACTIVENESS RATINGS
Attractiveness Derived From Anthropometric Measures
The anthropometric measures (BMI, WHR, WCR and VHI) are major determinant of physical attractiveness of a woman. A number of researchers have recently attempted to establish mathematical relationships between attractiveness and one or combinations of these measures.
1. Attractiveness Rating Equation by Tovee & others.
Tovee & others have researched and produced a graph relating human female attractiveness to BMI.
The graph of their results shows a smooth trend-line that peaks at BMI of 19 - 20. Attractiveness seems to drop sharply below BMI of 17, and it drops gradually for BMI values over 25.
Scaled Tovee's Attractiveness Rating
Here, we will scale the Attractiveness rating to vary from zero (minimum) to 1.0 (maximum). This is achieved as the Attractive rating in the graph divided by the maximum rating (=5).
2. Attractiveness Rating Equation by Smith & others
Smith et al have provided a quadratic equation relating female attractiveness to WHR, WCR and BMIPAR:
(this published equation gives a lot higher value than expected; authors have been contacted for verification)
BMIPAR, is the area of the body divided by
the perimeter length around the edge of the body. BMIPAR has been shown
to be an accurate proxy for BMI. We derived the following linear equation from the BMI-vs-BMIPAR graph as:
BMIPAR = 17.25 + 0.0714*BMI.
Scaled Smiths's Attractiveness Rating
Here, we will scale the Attractiveness rating to vary from zero (minimum) to 1.0 (maximum). This is achieved as the Attractive rating calculated from the equation divided by the peak rating (=???).
3. Attractiveness Rating Equation by Fan & others
Research by Fan et al have indicated that the body volume divided by the square of height, defined as Volume Height Index (VHI), is the most important and direct visual determinant of female physical attractiveness.
Attractiveness Rating can be related to VHI by the following fitted two-half bell-shaped exponential equations.
Scaled Fan's Attractiveness Rating
Here, we will scale the Attractiveness rating to vary from zero (minimum) to 1.0 (maximum). This is achieved as the Attractive rating in the graph divided by the maximum rating (=8).
4. Attractiveness Rating based on Body Curviness Index (BCI)
There's no doubt that a slim waistline between shapely hips and prominent breasts makes a woman highly appealing, this is regardless of the woman's overall body size and weight.
Colloquially, people refer to female body which has significant and pleasing constrasts between the chest, waist and hips as "curvy". Other terms used to describe such body contours include: bosomy, busty, buxom, curvaceous, full-bosomed, well-endowed, stacked, voluptuous, shapely.
Until now, there is no known methodology or biometric parameter for quantifying and thus comparing the relative curviness of two or more female bodies. Hand gestures are often used to describe the hourglass shape of a woman. Significant body curves usually occur at the breasts, waistline and hips. Each curve adds to the curviness of the body, the total curviness would involve some sort of aggregation of the curviness contributions of each curve.
Here we propose to the world for the first time (Jan-2008) a simple index (BCI) for the describing the overall female body contour (details to appear in the literature):
BCI = ([C*H]/[W*W]) - 1
= [1 - WHR*WCR]/[WHR*WCR];
where
   C = chest circumference;
   W = waist circumference;
   H = hips circumference;
   WHR = W/H = waist-to-hips ratio;
   WCR = W/C = waist-to-chest ratio.
The BCI has the following features:
- The higher the index the curvier the body
- Zero value implies a tubular body; chest=waist=hips circumference
- Negative value implies that the waist has the widest circumference (barrel-shaped, obese, pregnant)
- Minimum theoretically possible negative value is -1.0
- Value of 1.0 corresponds to Singh's peak attractiveness rating: WHR = WCR = 0.7
- Value of 1.25 corresponds to the classical beauty queens' vital statistics of 36-24-36.
- Letter "C" or "H" is appended to the Index to uniquely indicate whether the subject is widest at the Chest or the Hips. Thus one will be able to distinguish between triangular and inverted-triangular body shapes having the same BCI.
Scaled BCI Rating
Here, we will scale the BCI Attractiveness rating to vary from zero (minimum) to 1.0 (maximum) as follows: BCI values between 0 and 1 remains unchanged; a value less than 0 is set to zero (tubular or preganant shapes are all set to non-curvy); a value greater than 1 is set to one (curvy and very very curvy are lumped together as curvy).
Tips
◊ Use link
EXAMPLE Of Input/Output
to demo data entry expectations and results; you may edit & use it as starting point
BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Tovee MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL & Cornelissen PL; Optimal BMI and maximum sexual attractiveness; Lancet 1998, 352:548
-
Smith KL, Tovee MJ, Hancock PJB, Bateson M, Cox MAA, & Cornelissen PL; An Analysis Of Body Shape Attractiveness Based On Image Statistics: Evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination;
Visual Cognition, (2007), 1-27
-
Singh D; Universal Allure Of The Hourglass Figure: An Evolutionary Theory
of Female Physical Attractiveness;
Clinics In Plastic Surgery, 33, (2006) 359–370
-
Singh D., Body Shape And Women's Attractiveness: The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio;
Human Nature, (1993), Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 297-321
-
Fan J, Dai W, Qian X, Chau KP & Liu Q; Effects Of Shape Parameters On The Attractiveness
Of A Female Body; Perceptual and Motor Skills, (2007), 105, 117-132
-
Fan J, Liu Q, Wu J, Dai W; Visual perception of female physical attractiveness; Proc. Royal Soc of London, Serties-B Biological Sciences, (2004), 271 (1537), 347-352